Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Naresh Kumar Sen Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Naresh Kumar Sen vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Nov 26, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1045798

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Naresh Kumar Sen

Advocate Shri. V.D.S. Chauhan

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

naresh kumar sen versus state 1 w.p.no.15912/2012 26/11/2012 shri v.d.s. chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioners.shri ved prakash tiwari, learned panel lawyer for the respondents. petitioner has been suspended due to his involvement in a criminal case in crime no.45/2002 for offences under section 420, 467, 468, 471, 409, 34 of ipc. it is a case of the petitioner that vide circular dated 6.11.2002 the state government has taken a decision to review the cases of employees who have been under suspension for a long period due to involvement in criminal cases. placing reliance on the benefit granted to a similarly situated person namely shri anand kumar tiwari, petitioner has filed this writ petition and it is stated as petitioner has remained under suspension for more than 10 years.therefore, in view of circular dated 6.11.2002 suspension be revoked. having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and taking note of mandate of circular dated 6.11.2002, the competent authority is directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner for revocation of suspension after taking note of the policies and circulars of the state government, benefit granted to similarly situated person like shri anand kumar tiwari and decide the claim of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. with the aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge mrs.mishra

Full Judgment

naresh kumar sen versus state 1 W.P.No.15912/2012 26/11/2012 Shri V.D.S.

Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Ved Prakash Tiwari, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents.

Petitioner has been suspended due to his involvement in a criminal case in Crime No.45/2002 for offences under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 409, 34 of IPC.

It is a case of the petitioner that vide Circular dated 6.11.2002 the State Government has taken a decision to review the cases of employees who have been under suspension for a long period due to involvement in criminal cases.

Placing reliance on the benefit granted to a similarly situated person namely Shri Anand Kumar Tiwari, petitioner has filed this writ petition and it is stated as petitioner has remained under suspension for more than 10 yeaRs.therefore, in view of Circular dated 6.11.2002 suspension be revoked.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and taking note of mandate of Circular dated 6.11.2002, the competent authority is directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner for revocation of suspension after taking note of the policies and circulars of the State Government, benefit granted to similarly situated person like Shri Anand Kumar Tiwari and decide the claim of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of.

c.c.as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge mrs.mishra

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial