M/S Narayan Traders Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

M/S Narayan Traders vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Mar 22, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1045496

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1045496
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Mar 22, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M/S Narayan Traders

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.21119/2012.(o) 22.3.2013 shri s. gulatee, advocate for the petitioner. shri rahul jain, government advocate, for the respondent no.1. shri sanjay sarvate, advocate for respondent no.2 and 3. learned counsel for respondent no.3 submits that he has been recently being engaged by respondent no.3 and he has to file vakalatnama . he wants two weeks' time to file reply. prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for the petitioner hence time is granted. i.r.granted earlier to continue till next date of hearing. list this petition alongwith all connected matter for analogous hearing after two weeks. certified copy as per rules. (m.a.siddiqui) judge ag/

Full Judgment

W.P.21119/2012.(O) 22.3.2013 Shri S.

Gulatee, Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Jain, Government Advocate, for the respondent No.1.

Shri Sanjay Sarvate, Advocate for respondent No.2 and 3.

Learned counsel for respondent no.3 submits that he has been recently being engaged by respondent no.3 and he has to file Vakalatnama .

He wants two weeks' time to file reply.

Prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for the petitioner hence time is granted.

I.R.granted earlier to continue till next date of hearing.

List this petition alongwith all connected matter for analogous hearing after two weeks.

Certified copy as per rules.

(M.A.Siddiqui) JUDGE Ag/

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties M/S Narayan Traders vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education