Narendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Narendra Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 26, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1045378

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1045378
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Aug 26, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Narendra Singh

Advocate Shri. S.R.Tamrakar

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

.....brought to an end by stating that necessary allotment of funds has not been made at damoh. it is submitted that while similarly engaged persons are still continuing in sagar division and else where, the petitioners have been singled out in this treatment under clause 22 of the appointment order and clause 9.1 of the agreement for contractual appointment which is discriminatory. moreso, as the funds for implementation of the scheme is available but because of lapse on the part of the authorities at damoh adequate withdrawal has not been made. having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners it is observed that the facts as to whether manrega is being implemented in damoh, whether it has been closed down, whether funds are available or not are required to be considered by the competent authority at state level. in the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the concerned authority by filing a representation within 15 days from today. it goes without saying that in case the petitioners do so along with a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two months thereafter. it is also observed that in case the scheme continues at damoh, the petitioners shall be continued at damoh and granted all the consequential benefits in accordance with law. with the aforesaid liberty/observations, the petition filed by the petitioners stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

W.P.No.14234/2013 (Narendra Singh and others versus State of MP and otheRs.26.08.2013 Heard Shri S.R.Tamrakar, learned counsel for the petitioners on the question of admission and interim relief.

The petitioners have filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 18.07.2013 by which the respondents/authorities have informed the petitioners that their services on contract basis as technical assistants for executing work under the Mahatma Gandhi Rashtriya Gramin Rojgar Guarantee Yojna being implemented in the State by M.P.Rajya Rojgar Guarantee Parishad Panchayat and Rural Development Department have been brought to an end by stating that necessary allotment of funds has not been made at Damoh.

It is submitted that while similarly engaged persons are still continuing in Sagar Division and else where, the petitioners have been singled out in this treatment under clause 22 of the appointment order and clause 9.1 of the agreement for contractual appointment which is discriminatory.

Moreso, as the funds for implementation of the scheme is available but because of lapse on the part of the authorities at Damoh adequate withdrawal has not been made.

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners it is observed that the facts as to whether MANREGA is being implemented in Damoh, whether it has been closed down, whether funds are available or not are required to be considered by the competent authority at State level.

In the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the concerned authority by filing a representation within 15 days from today.

It goes without saying that in case the petitioners do so along with a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two months thereafter.

It is also observed that in case the Scheme continues at Damoh, the petitioners shall be continued at Damoh and granted all the consequential benefits in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid liberty/observations, the petition filed by the petitioners stands disposed of.

C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Narendra Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education