Full Judgment
WRIT PETITION No.14485/201”
26. 08.2013 Shri Ghanshyam Barman, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Lalit Joglekar, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State.
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is working in the establishment of respondent No.4 which is said to be State Aided Institute.
The State Government has introduced a policy for grant of higher pay scale (Kramonnati) to such employees who have stagnated in one post or one pay scale for a period of 12 or 24 yeaRs.According to the petitioner, the circular has been issued in this respect on 03.03.1986 which has been reiterated on 13.03.1999.
It is further contended that this court has disposed of similar claim made by one Anjani Prasad Mishra, who has field W.P.No.843/2011(s).vide order dated 21.01.2011, with a direction to consider the case of the petitioner in that case in terms of the circulars of the State Government and to pass the necessary ordeRs.The order passed in the case of Anjani Prasad Mishra versus State of M.P.and others referred to herein above is looked into.
This Court has only directed the respondents to examine the claim of the persons like petitioner in terms of the policies made by the State Government and if in case the persons like petitioner are found fit for grant of such benefit, to pass appropriate orders within a period of three months.
WRIT PETITION No.14485/2013 2 Looking to the aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of with a directions to the respondents to examine the claim of the petitioner for grant of benefit of higher pay scale/Kramonnati as is prescribed in circular dated 03.03.1986 and 13.03.1999 and in case the petitioner is found fit for grant of such benefit, to extend such benefit within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid.
Certified copy as per rules.
(K.K.Trivedi) Judge Skc