Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Brajmohan Singh Vs. Vishwanath Singh

Brajmohan Singh vs Vishwanath Singh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 29, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1045290

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Brajmohan Singh

Respondent

Vishwanath Singh

Excerpt

second appeal no.650/2013 29.07.2013 mr.abhishek gulatee, learned counsel for the appellant. let records of the courts below be sent for. registry is directed to issue requisition for records within a week. heard on i.a.no.8371/2013. on payment of p.f.by registered post with acknowledgment due within a week issue notice of aforesaid i.a.to the respondents. notices be made returnable within a period of 6 weeks. learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the respondents are trying to create third party interest in respect of the suit land and in case they are not restrained, the same would lead to unnecessary complications. taking into account the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant and in view of the law laid down by the supreme court in maharwal khewaji trust (regd.).faridkot versus baldev dass, (2004) 8 scc 488.it is directed that till next date of hearing respondents shall not create any third party interest in respect of the suit lands or alienate it. let the appeal be listed for orders on admission as well as for consideration of aforesaid i.a.in the week commencing 23.9.2013. certified copy as per rules. (alok aradhe) judge rc

Full Judgment

Second Appeal No.650/2013 29.07.2013 Mr.Abhishek Gulatee, learned counsel for the appellant.

Let records of the Courts below be sent for.

Registry is directed to issue requisition for records within a week.

Heard on I.A.No.8371/2013.

On payment of P.F.by registered post with acknowledgment due within a week issue notice of aforesaid I.A.to the respondents.

Notices be made returnable within a period of 6 weeks.

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the respondents are trying to create third party interest in respect of the suit land and in case they are not restrained, the same would lead to unnecessary complications.

Taking into account the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant and in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Maharwal Khewaji Trust (Regd.).Faridkot versus Baldev Dass, (2004) 8 SCC 488.it is directed that till next date of hearing respondents shall not create any third party interest in respect of the suit lands or alienate it.

Let the appeal be listed for orders on admission as well as for consideration of aforesaid I.A.in the week commencing 23.9.2013.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Alok Aradhe) Judge RC

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial