Full Judgment
W.P.No.11089/2013 (L.D.Tiwari versus State of MP and otheRs.29.07.2013 Shri V.K.Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Ms.MPS Chuckal, learned P.L.for the State/respondents.
Heard on the question of admission.
The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the fact that the petitioner is not being permitted to participate in the counselling being conducted for making appointments on the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak, Grade-III though the petitioner is over qualified having obtained a D.Ed.
degree.
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after a perusal of the petition it is observed on a statement to that effect being made by the learned counsel for the State, that similar petitions wherein the petitioners had raised the same issue, have been dismissed by this Court with observations in the case of Sanyogita Thakur and others v.
State of M.P.and otheRs.reported in 2013 (2) MPLJ 20 and without any observations in W.P.No.6129/2013 (S).finally decided on 15-4-2013 and in the circumstances this petition being identical, the same is also dismissed.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that in the case of Sanyogita Thakur (supra) this Court has made certain observations and, therefore, the same may also be made in the present petition.
However, it is observed that the said observations had been made on an undertaking given by the learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents in that case and as no such undertaking has been given in the present petition, the observations made by this Court in the case of Sanyogita Thakur (supra) while dismissing the claim of the petitioner, cannot be made in the present petition.
In view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is dismissed in terms of and for the same reasons, which may be read as a part of this order, as stated in W.P.No.6129/2013.
The petition stands dismissed accordingly.
(R.S.Jha) Judge msp