Devnarayan Verma Vs. Nannu Lal

Devnarayan Verma vs Nannu Lal

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 29, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1045281

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1045281
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 29, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devnarayan Verma

Respondent

Nannu Lal

Excerpt

cr.a.no.1777/2013 26.7.13 as per b.d.rathi,j ku. mamta dubey, advocate for the appellant. shri vijay pandey, deputy advocate general for the respondent no.3-state. heard on i.a.no.16752/13, which is an application under section 5 of the limitation act. as per office note, the appeal is barred by 24 days. considering the reasons assigned therein, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is, hereby condoned. heard on admission. the appeal is arguable, hence admitted for final hearing. record of the trial court has already been received. let bailable warrant of arrest in the sum of rs.2000/- (rupees two thousand).be issued against each one of respondent nos.1 and 2 namely nannulal and mithun, for their appearance before the registry of this court on 4/9/13 and on such other dates as may be fixed in this regard. matter be listed, along with connected cr.a.no.1306/13, for final hearing in due course. (ajit singh) (b.d.rathi) judge judge (and)

Full Judgment

Cr.A.No.1777/2013 26.7.13 As per B.D.Rathi,J Ku.

Mamta Dubey, Advocate for the appellant.

Shri Vijay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General for the respondent no.3-State.

Heard on I.A.No.16752/13, which is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

As per office note, the appeal is barred by 24 days.

Considering the reasons assigned therein, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is, hereby condoned.

Heard on admission.

The appeal is arguable, hence admitted for final hearing.

Record of the trial Court has already been received.

Let bailable warrant of arrest in the sum of Rs.2000/- (Rupees two thousand).be issued against each one of respondent Nos.1 and 2 namely Nannulal and Mithun, for their appearance before the Registry of this Court on 4/9/13 and on such other dates as may be fixed in this regard.

Matter be listed, along with connected Cr.A.No.1306/13, for final hearing in due course.

(AJIT SINGH) (B.D.RATHI) JUDGE JUDGE (and)

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Devnarayan Verma vs Nannu Lal Same Subject Education