Rajendra Kumar Vs. Mishrilal

Rajendra Kumar vs Mishrilal

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 19, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1045249

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1045249
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 19, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajendra Kumar

Respondent

Mishrilal

Advocate Shri. I. Hussain

Excerpt

writ petition no.7489/07. 19.10.2012 none for the petitioners.shri i. hussain, learned counsel for the respondent no.1. shri s.s.bisen, learned govt. adv.for the respondents no.2. this case is listed today for consideration of admission and interim relief, but in the absence of petitioners’ counsel such question could not be considered. it is noted that on earlier occasion this matter was listed on 5.10.2012 and on taking up the matter no one was present on behalf of the petitioners on which it was adjourned. pursuant to it, it is listed today and same position that on taking up the matter no one is present to prosecute this petition. in such premises, it appears that the petitioner is no more interested in prosecuting this petition. consequently this petition is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. certified copy as per rules. (u.c.maheshwari) judge pb

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No.7489/07.

19.10.2012 None for the petitioneRs.Shri I.

Hussain, learned counsel for the respondent no.1.

Shri S.S.Bisen, learned Govt.

Adv.for the respondents no.2.

This case is listed today for consideration of admission and interim relief, but in the absence of petitioners’ counsel such question could not be considered.

It is noted that on earlier occasion this matter was listed on 5.10.2012 and on taking up the matter no one was present on behalf of the petitioners on which it was adjourned.

Pursuant to it, it is listed today and same position that on taking up the matter no one is present to prosecute this petition.

In such premises, it appears that the petitioner is no more interested in prosecuting this petition.

Consequently this petition is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.

Certified copy as per rules.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge Pb

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Rajendra Kumar vs Mishrilal Same Subject Education