Mukesh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Mukesh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jan 03, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1045185

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1045185
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jan 03, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mukesh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

criminal appeal no.2717/2012 3.1.2013 shri hemendra singh thakur, advocate, for the appellants. shri abhishek gulatee, government advocate, for the state/ special police establishment, lokayukt. heard on admission. admit. record of the trial court be called for. the appeal be not listed for final hearing. also heard on i.a.no.26508/2012, which is an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail on behalf of appellant no.1 mukesh and appellant no.2 m.m.beg. the appellants were on bail during trial and have been released on bail after conviction. they have also deposited the fine amount. having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that if appellants mukesh and m.m.beg furnish a solvent surety in the sum of rs.30,000/- each and execute a personal bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate, chhindwara, the execution of sentence of imprisonment passed against them shall remain suspended and they shall be released on bail. the appellants shall not appear before the registry of this court on 18.3.2013 and on such other dates as may be directed by the office. the application is allowed. in the result, i.a.no.27155/2012, which is an application for amendment, also stands allowed. certified copy as per rules. (ajit singh) (u.c.maheshwari) judge judge ps

Full Judgment

Criminal Appeal No.2717/2012 3.1.2013 Shri Hemendra Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.

Shri Abhishek Gulatee, Government Advocate, for the State/ Special Police Establishment, Lokayukt.

Heard on admission.

Admit.

Record of the trial court be called for.

The appeal be not listed for final hearing.

Also heard on I.A.No.26508/2012, which is an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail on behalf of appellant no.1 Mukesh and appellant no.2 M.M.Beg.

The appellants were on bail during trial and have been released on bail after conviction.

They have also deposited the fine amount.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that if appellants Mukesh and M.M.Beg furnish a solvent surety in the sum of Rs.30,000/- each and execute a personal bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chhindwara, the execution of sentence of imprisonment passed against them shall remain suspended and they shall be released on bail.

The appellants shall not appear before the Registry of this Court on 18.3.2013 and on such other dates as may be directed by the office.

The application is allowed.

In the result, I.A.No.27155/2012, which is an application for amendment, also stands allowed.

Certified copy as per rules.

(AJIT SINGH) (U.C.MAHESHWARI) JUDGE JUDGE ps

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Mukesh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education