Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Deep Kumar @ Deepak

The State of Madhya Pradesh vs Deep Kumar @ Deepak

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 22, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1045014

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Respondent

Deep Kumar @ Deepak

Excerpt

misc. criminal case no.9166/2012 22.8.13 shri vijay pandey, deputy advocate general for the applicant-state. heard on admission. considering the reasoning assigned for discarding the incriminating evidence brought on record, the application is allowed and leave to appeal against the impugned judgment of acquittal is granted. case be registered as criminal appeal. issue bailable warrant for a sum of rs.1000/- (rupees one thousand) against each one of respondent nos.1 and 2 namely deep kumar alias deepak and mamta alias rajkumari jaiswal to secure their presence before this court on 8/10/13. appeal be listed for consideration on the question of admission on 8/10/13. (ajit singh) (b.d.rathi) judge judge (and)

Full Judgment

Misc.

Criminal Case No.9166/2012 22.8.13 Shri Vijay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General for the applicant-State.

Heard on admission.

Considering the reasoning assigned for discarding the incriminating evidence brought on record, the application is allowed and leave to appeal against the impugned judgment of acquittal is granted.

Case be registered as Criminal Appeal.

Issue bailable warrant for a sum of Rs.1000/- (Rupees one thousand) against each one of respondent Nos.1 and 2 namely Deep Kumar alias Deepak and Mamta alias Rajkumari Jaiswal to secure their presence before this Court on 8/10/13.

Appeal be listed for consideration on the question of admission on 8/10/13.

(AJIT SINGH) (B.D.RATHI) JUDGE JUDGE (and)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial