Sonelal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Sonelal vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 22, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1044993

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1044993
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Aug 22, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sonelal

Advocate Shri. Raman Patel

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

.....to be contrary to the policy, the appropriate remedy of the petitioner is to approach the authority themselves by filing a representation. in view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect w.p.no.13597/2013 sonelal vs. state of m.p. & ors.2 that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation before the respondent authorities within fifteen days from today alongwith a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with the transfer policy as far as possible preferably within a period of six weeks thereafter. the petitioner, if so advised, may also move an application for interim relief which shall be considered by the concerned authority at the earliest. it is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and therefore the authority would be at liberty to examine the matter keeping all facts and facets into consideration and thereafter either accept or reject the representation by passing a reasoned order. with the aforesaid direction, the petition, filed by the petitioner, stands disposed of. c.c as per rules. ( r.s.jha ) judge mms/-

Full Judgment

W.P.No.13597/2013 Sonelal vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 22.08.2013 Shri Raman Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Rajmani Singroul, learned counsel for the Caveator.

Heard on the question of admission and interim relief.

The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 15.7.2013 by which he has been transferred as Panchayat Secretary from Gram Panchayat Manakwara to Gram Panchayat Kushner.

It is submitted that the impugned order of transfer is violative of Clause 4 and other clauses of the transfer policy which provides that a Panchayat Secretary can only be transferred to an adjacent Gram Panchayat.

It is further submitted that there is no complaint against the petitioner inspite of which he has been transferred.

A Division Bench of this Court in the case of R.S.Chaudhary versus State of M.P.and OtheRs.ILR [2007].MP 132.has already held that in case transfer is alleged to be contrary to the policy, the appropriate remedy of the petitioner is to approach the authority themselves by filing a representation.

In view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect W.P.No.13597/2013 Sonelal vs. State of M.P. & ORS.2 that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation before the respondent authorities within fifteen days from today alongwith a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with the transfer policy as far as possible preferably within a period of six weeks thereafter.

The petitioner, if so advised, may also move an application for interim relief which shall be considered by the concerned authority at the earliest.

It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and therefore the authority would be at liberty to examine the matter keeping all facts and facets into consideration and thereafter either accept or reject the representation by passing a reasoned order.

With the aforesaid direction, the petition, filed by the petitioner, stands disposed of.

C.C as per rules.

( R.S.JHA ) JUDGE mms/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Sonelal vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education