Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pappu Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Pappu Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 22, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1044977

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pappu Singh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

.....was submitted on 5.8.2012 and on the basis of that report a punishment was imposed upon the lady police constable for making a false complaint. it is submitted that thereafter, without looking into the aforesaid aspect, simply on the basis of the fact that the state women commission have issued certain directions, the respondent authorities have again initiated proceedings against the petitioner and have issued the impugned charge sheet which is not permissible. it is submitted that once the respondents have already conducted an enquiry and exonerated the petitioner and found the lady police constable guilty, the petitioner cannot be subjected to harassment simply on account of the fact that the complainant is a woman. it is submitted that in such circumstances working of all men constables in the police department would become very difficult. w.p.no.13595/2013 pappu singh vs. state of m.p. & ors.2 having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is observed that the petitioner has not filed any objection to the notice and charge sheet issued to the petitioner and the respondent authorities have also not applied their mind to the aforesaid aspect and as to the impact of the previous report dated 5.8.2012. in the circumstances, without entering into the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner files an objection to the departmental proceedings being taken up by the respondent authorities within fifteen days from today alongwith a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law by passing a reasoned order before proceedings any further against the petitioner pursuant to the impugned charge sheet. it is made clear that if the authorities find no justification for issuing the charge sheet, they would be at liberty to withdraw the same. with the aforesaid direction,.....

Full Judgment

W.P.No.13595/2013 Pappu Singh vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 22.08.2013 Heard Shri Praveen Verma, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief.

The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the charge sheet dated 30.3.2013 and the report against the petitioner dated 4.2.2013.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that on a false complaint being made by one lady police constable Pooja Singh, an enquiry was conducted against the petitioner on the basis of which a fact finding enquiry was conducted and a report exonerating him was submitted on 5.8.2012 and on the basis of that report a punishment was imposed upon the lady police constable for making a false complaint.

It is submitted that thereafter, without looking into the aforesaid aspect, simply on the basis of the fact that the State Women Commission have issued certain directions, the respondent authorities have again initiated proceedings against the petitioner and have issued the impugned charge sheet which is not permissible.

It is submitted that once the respondents have already conducted an enquiry and exonerated the petitioner and found the lady police constable guilty, the petitioner cannot be subjected to harassment simply on account of the fact that the complainant is a woman.

It is submitted that in such circumstances working of all men constables in the police department would become very difficult.

W.P.No.13595/2013 Pappu Singh vs. State of M.P. & ORS.2 Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is observed that the petitioner has not filed any objection to the notice and charge sheet issued to the petitioner and the respondent authorities have also not applied their mind to the aforesaid aspect and as to the impact of the previous report dated 5.8.2012.

In the circumstances, without entering into the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner files an objection to the departmental proceedings being taken up by the respondent authorities within fifteen days from today alongwith a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law by passing a reasoned order before proceedings any further against the petitioner pursuant to the impugned charge sheet.

It is made clear that if the authorities find no justification for issuing the charge sheet, they would be at liberty to withdraw the same.

With the aforesaid direction, the petition, filed by the petitioner, stands disposed of.

C.C as per rules.

( R.S.JHA ) JUDGE mms/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial