Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Carter Vs. Miller

Carter vs Miller

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-17-1978
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/104469

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
434 U.S. 356
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Carter

Respondent

Miller

Excerpt

carter v. miller - 434 u.s. 356 (1978) u.s. supreme court carter v. miller, 434 u.s. 356 (1978) 434 u.s. 356 carter, public vehicle license commissioner of chicago v. miller certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit no. 76-1171. argued november 29-30, 1977 decided january 17, 1978 547 f.2d 1314 , affirmed by an equally divided court. william r. quinlan argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the briefs were daniel pascale and robert retke. robert masur argued the cause for respondent. with him on the briefs were alan freedman, howard eglit, and david goldberger. * per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. mr. justice blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [ footnote * ] briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by william b. spann, jr., and robert b. mckay for the american bar assn.; and by james r. madison and norman c. hile for the san francisco lawyers' committee for urban affairs. page 434 u.s. 356, 357

Full Judgment

CARTER v. MILLER - 434 U.S. 356 (1978)
U.S. Supreme Court CARTER v. MILLER, 434 U.S. 356 (1978) 434 U.S. 356

CARTER, PUBLIC VEHICLE LICENSE COMMISSIONER OF CHICAGO v. MILLER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 76-1171.

Argued November 29-30, 1977
Decided January 17, 1978

547 F.2d 1314 , affirmed by an equally divided Court.

William R. Quinlan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Daniel Pascale and Robert Retke.

Robert Masur argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were Alan Freedman, Howard Eglit, and David Goldberger. *

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[ Footnote * ] Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by William B. Spann, Jr., and Robert B. McKay for the American Bar Assn.; and by James R. Madison and Norman C. Hile for the San Francisco Lawyers' Committee for Urban Affairs.

Page 434 U.S. 356, 357



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial