Amit Kumar Vs. Shri Prashant Mehta

Amit Kumar vs Shri Prashant Mehta

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jun 20, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1044678

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1044678
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jun 20, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amit Kumar

Respondent

Shri Prashant Mehta

Excerpt

1 conc. no. 478 of 2009 20.6.2013 none for the parties. perused the record. w.p. no. 12117/2007 at the instance of petitioner was disposed of on 18.6.2008 with a direction to the respondents to settle the retiral dues in favour of the petitioner on the basis of succession certificate produced by him. complaining disobedience of said order petitioner has filed this petition for taking action against the respondents. on being noticed respondents have filed return wherein it is stated that claim in lieu of group insurance scheme, final payment of departmental provident fund, leave encashment and death cum retirement gratuity to the tune of rs.2,50,000/, rs.87,118/, rs.40,079/ and rs.37,550/ respectively have been settled in favour of petitioner vide cheque nos. 160764, 160765, 160766 and 160767 dated 29.7.2009. it is further stated vide i.a. no. 7266/2009 that interest in lieu of delayed payment has also been settled in favour of the petitioner vide cheque dated 17.6.2011. these facts have not been controverted by the petitioner. in view whereof this court is satisfied that there is a substantial compliance of order dated 28.6.2008 passed in w.p. no. 12117/2007 as would warrant any action against the respondents. consequently proceedings are dropped. rule nisi discharged. (sanjay yadav) judge vivek tripathi

Full Judgment

1 Conc. No. 478 Of 2009 20.6.2013 None for the parties.

Perused the record.

W.P. No. 12117/2007 at the instance of petitioner was disposed of on 18.6.2008 with a direction to the respondents to settle the retiral dues in favour of the petitioner on the basis of succession certificate produced by him. Complaining disobedience of said order petitioner has filed this petition for taking action against the respondents.

On being noticed respondents have filed return wherein it is stated that claim in lieu of Group Insurance Scheme, Final payment of Departmental Provident Fund, Leave encashment and Death cum Retirement Gratuity to the tune of Rs.2,50,000/, Rs.87,118/, Rs.40,079/ and Rs.37,550/ respectively have been settled in favour of petitioner vide Cheque Nos. 160764, 160765, 160766 and 160767 dated 29.7.2009.

It is further stated vide I.A. No. 7266/2009 that interest in lieu of delayed payment has also been settled in favour of the petitioner vide cheque dated 17.6.2011.

These facts have not been controverted by the petitioner.

In view whereof this Court is satisfied that there is a substantial compliance of order dated 28.6.2008 passed in W.P. No. 12117/2007 as would warrant any action against the respondents. Consequently proceedings are dropped. Rule NISI discharged.

(SANJAY YADAV) JUDGE Vivek Tripathi

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Amit Kumar vs Shri Prashant Mehta Same Subject Education