Ashish Kumar Panda Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Ashish Kumar Panda vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Dec 10, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1044667

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1044667
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Dec 10, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ashish Kumar Panda

Advocate Shri. Girish Shrivastava

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.19877/2012 10.12.2012 shri girish shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners.heard on the question of admission. the petitioners have filed this petition under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuing appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus directing the authority of respondent no.3 - tahsildar to submit the report to draw final decree to the executing court following the basic principle of law to settle the purchasers in the portion of their occupation. in the cours.of arguments on admission in response of some query of the court based on section 44 and section 50 of the m.p.land revenue code as well as section 47 of the cpc instead to argue further, the petitioners.counsel seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate application before the executing court (civil court) under section 47 of the cpc as well as appropriate proceeding before the tahsildar as well as before revisional/appellate authority of the revenue sector to challenge the disputed order mentioned in this petition. he also seeks liberty to file appropriate petition or the application before the appropriate forum to take the cognizance of contempt of court against the concerning person who had violated the order/decree of the civil court. considering such prayer the petition is hereby dismissed as withdraw with liberties, aforesaid. c c as per rules. (u.c.maheshwari) judge bks

Full Judgment

W.P.No.19877/2012 10.12.2012 Shri Girish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Heard on the question of admission.

The petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the authority of respondent No.3 - Tahsildar to submit the report to draw final decree to the Executing Court following the basic principle of law to settle the purchasers in the portion of their occupation.

In the couRs.of arguments on admission in response of some query of the court based on Section 44 and Section 50 of the M.P.Land Revenue Code as well as Section 47 of the CPC instead to argue further, the petitioneRs.counsel seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate application before the Executing Court (Civil Court) under Section 47 of the CPC as well as appropriate proceeding before the Tahsildar as well as before Revisional/Appellate Authority of the Revenue Sector to challenge the disputed order mentioned in this petition.

He also seeks liberty to file appropriate petition or the application before the appropriate forum to take the cognizance of Contempt of Court against the concerning person who had violated the order/decree of the Civil Court.

Considering such prayer the petition is hereby dismissed as withdraw with liberties, aforesaid.

C c as per rules.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge bks

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Ashish Kumar Panda vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition