Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

A.K. Singla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

A.K. Singla vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 06, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1044612

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.K. Singla

Advocate Dr. Anuvad Shrivastava

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.1643/2013 6.2.2013 dr. anuvad shrivastava, counsel for the petitioners.shri sameer chile, ga for the state. let notice for admission as well as for iano.2942/2013, an application for staying the further proceedings of investigation on the basis of fir registered at police station churhata district rewa (mp).be issued to the respondent no.2 on payment of process fee within seven days by both modes (rad as well as ordinary mode).notices be made returnable within four weeks. in the meanwhile, since petitioners have been impleaded as accused in a case where removal of encroachment was done by order of competent revenue court, therefore, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners.till next date of hearing. list this matter immediately after service of notice on the respondent no.2. c.c.as per rules. (a.k.sharma) judge ravi

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.1643/2013 6.2.2013 Dr.

Anuvad Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Sameer Chile, GA for the State.

Let notice for admission as well as for IANo.2942/2013, an application for staying the further proceedings of investigation on the basis of FIR registered at Police Station Churhata District Rewa (MP).be issued to the respondent No.2 on payment of process fee within seven days by both modes (RAD as well as Ordinary Mode).Notices be made returnable within four weeks.

In the meanwhile, since petitioners have been impleaded as accused in a case where removal of encroachment was done by order of Competent Revenue Court, therefore, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioneRs.till next date of hearing.

List this matter immediately after service of notice on the respondent No.2.

C.C.as per rules.

(A.K.Sharma) JUDGE ravi

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties A.K. Singla vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition
Land Acquisition

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales