Ramesh Kumar Vs. Prabhat Kumar

Ramesh Kumar vs Prabhat Kumar

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 06, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1044552

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1044552
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Feb 06, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramesh Kumar

Advocate Shri. Pranay Verma

Respondent

Prabhat Kumar

Advocate Shri. Neeraj Vegad

Excerpt

f.a.no.73/2013 6.2.2013 shri pranay verma, counsel for appellants. shri neeraj vegad, counsel for respondent nos.1, 3 & 4. heard on admission. this appeal is admitted for final hearing. notice on behalf of respondent nos.1, 3 & 4 is accepted by shri vegad. appellants to serve copy of memo of appeal to shri vegad, if already not served. issue notice to respondent no.2. steps within a period of three working days by regd. a/d post. notice be made returnable within four weeks. i.a.no.1013/2013 under order 39 rules 1 & 2 c.p.c.notice of this application is accepted by shri vegad. he prays for two weeks time to file reply. prayer is allowed. issue notice of this application to respondent no.2 also. steps within a period of three working days by speed post. notice be made returnable before the next date of hearing. considering the finding recorded by the trial court in para 35 of the impugned judgment, we direct that till next date of hearing, status quo as on today, in respect of the possession on the suit f.a.no.73/2013 house, be maintained by both the parties. be listed for further hearing on 13.3.2013 on this application. record of the trial court be summoned. c.c., as per rules. (krishn kumar lahoti) (m.a.siddiqui) judge judge m.

Full Judgment

F.A.No.73/2013 6.2.2013 Shri Pranay Verma, counsel for appellants.

Shri Neeraj Vegad, counsel for respondent nos.1, 3 & 4.

Heard on admission.

This appeal is admitted for final hearing.

Notice on behalf of respondent nos.1, 3 & 4 is accepted by Shri Vegad.

Appellants to serve copy of memo of appeal to Shri Vegad, if already not served.

Issue notice to respondent no.2.

Steps within a period of three working days by Regd.

A/D post.

Notice be made returnable within four weeks.

I.A.No.1013/2013 under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 C.P.C.Notice of this application is accepted by Shri Vegad.

He prays for two weeks time to file reply.

Prayer is allowed.

Issue notice of this application to respondent no.2 also.

Steps within a period of three working days by speed post.

Notice be made returnable before the next date of hearing.

Considering the finding recorded by the trial Court in para 35 of the impugned judgment, we direct that till next date of hearing, status quo as on today, in respect of the possession on the suit F.A.No.73/2013 house, be maintained by both the parties.

Be listed for further hearing on 13.3.2013 on this application.

Record of the trial Court be summoned.

C.C., as per rules.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (M.A.Siddiqui) JUDGE JUDGE M.

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Ramesh Kumar vs Prabhat Kumar Same Subject Education