Vijay Shankar Vs. Mahadev

Vijay Shankar vs Mahadev

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 11, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1044428

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1044428
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Feb 11, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vijay Shankar

Advocate Shri. Pushpendra Dubey

Respondent

Mahadev

Excerpt

1 w.p.no.17678/2011 11.2.2013 shri pushpendra dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. challenging an order dated 20.9.2011 passed by 2nd civil judge class ii, multai, district betul, this writ petition has been filed. by the said order an application filed by the petitioner under section 151 of cpc objecting to documents of partition deed has been rejected. it is found by the court below that the partition deed was filed along with the suit and when it was taken on record, no objection was raised and finding the objection to be raised after a long period, the same is rejected. the order in question is passed in the year 2011. at that point of time evidence in the matter was going on and not after more than one and a half years till date even notices have not been issued. order is an interlocutory order passed in a pending suit. under such circumstances, i see no reason to interfere after a period o”1. 2 years after passing of the order, particularly when petitioner can very well challenge the action after the final order is passed. accordingly granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order if required after the suit is finally decided by raising grounds made in this writ petition, the petition is dismissed. (rajendra menon) judge mrs.mishra

Full Judgment

1 W.P.No.17678/2011 11.2.2013 Shri Pushpendra Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Challenging an order dated 20.9.2011 passed by 2nd Civil Judge Class II, Multai, District Betul, this writ petition has been filed.

By the said order an application filed by the petitioner under Section 151 of CPC objecting to documents of partition deed has been rejected.

It is found by the Court below that the partition deed was filed along with the suit and when it was taken on record, no objection was raised and finding the objection to be raised after a long period, the same is rejected.

The order in question is passed in the year 2011.

At that point of time evidence in the matter was going on and not after more than one and a half years till date even notices have not been issued.

Order is an interlocutory order passed in a pending suit.

Under such circumstances, I see no reason to interfere after a period o”

1. 2 years after passing of the order, particularly when petitioner can very well challenge the action after the final order is passed.

Accordingly granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order if required after the suit is finally decided by raising grounds made in this writ petition, the petition is dismissed.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Mrs.mishra

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Vijay Shankar vs Mahadev Same Subject Education