Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Narendra Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Narendra Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 11, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1044412

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Narendra Kumar

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.c.c.no.89/201”11. 02.2013 smt.s.paliwal, learned counsel for the applicants. heard on i.a.no.744/2013, an application under section 5 of the limitation act for condoning the delay in filing the m.c.c.for restoration of the writ petition, dismissed for want of prosecution. for the reasons stated in the application, duly supported by an affidavit of the counsel, the same is allowed. the delay in filing the m.c.c.for restoration is condoned. heard on the question of admission. for the reasons stated in the application, the m.c.c.stands allowed. w.p.no.28146/2003 be restored on its original number and be listed before the appropriate bench for hearing. the m.c.c.stands allowed and disposed of. (k.k.trivedi) judge skc

Full Judgment

M.C.C.No.89/201”

11. 02.2013 Smt.S.Paliwal, learned Counsel for the applicants.

Heard on I.A.No.744/2013, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay in filing the M.C.C.for restoration of the writ petition, dismissed for want of prosecution.

For the reasons stated in the application, duly supported by an affidavit of the counsel, the same is allowed.

The delay in filing the M.C.C.for restoration is condoned.

Heard on the question of admission.

For the reasons stated in the application, the M.C.C.stands allowed.

W.P.No.28146/2003 be restored on its original number and be listed before the appropriate Bench for hearing.

The M.C.C.stands allowed and disposed of.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge Skc

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial