Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Arvind Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Arvind vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 19, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1044357

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arvind

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.734/2013 19/02/2013 shri y.k.gupta, advocate for the applicant. shri a.k.singh, ga for the respondent/state. heard finally. this is the firs.bail application filed by applicant under section 439 of the cr.p.c for grant of bail. applicant has been arrested on 27/10/12 in connection with crime no.604/12 registered at p.s.khurai, district sagar for the offence punishable under sections 457 and 380 of ipc. learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to be disposed of finally therefore, he prays for bail to the applicant. learned counsel for the state submits that 56 cases of similar offence are pending against this applicant therefore, he prays for dismissal of the application. considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case alongwith the gravity of offence, i am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release this applicant on bail. therefore, without commenting on the merit of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicant arvind shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs.30,000/- (rs.thirty thousand only) with one surety of local resident in the like amount to the satisfaction of committal court/trial court, for securing his presence before the said court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge navin

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.734/2013 19/02/2013 Shri Y.K.Gupta, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri A.K.Singh, GA for the respondent/State.

Heard finally.

This is the fiRs.bail application filed by applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for grant of bail.

Applicant has been arrested on 27/10/12 in connection with Crime No.604/12 registered at P.S.Khurai, District Sagar for the offence punishable under sections 457 and 380 of IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case.

Charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to be disposed of finally therefore, he prays for bail to the applicant.

Learned counsel for the State submits that 56 cases of similar offence are pending against this applicant therefore, he prays for dismissal of the application.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case alongwith the gravity of offence, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release this applicant on bail.

Therefore, without commenting on the merit of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicant Arvind shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.Thirty Thousand only) with one surety of local resident in the like amount to the satisfaction of Committal Court/trial Court, for securing his presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.SOLANKI) Judge navin

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial