Tejilal Vs. Achchelal

Tejilal vs Achchelal

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided May 03, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1044323

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1044323
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: May 03, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Tejilal

Advocate Shri. Suyash Tripathi

Respondent

Achchelal

Excerpt

m.c.c.no.518/2009 03-05-2013 heard shri suyash tripathi, learned counsel for applicant on the application for restoration of s.a.no.501/95. it is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that due some reason he could not attend the hearing of the case which resulted in dismissal of s.a.no.501/95 for want of prosecution. the application is supported by an affidavit of the counsel for the applicant and as the reasons stated therein appear to be bona fide, the application for restoration is allowed. the impugned order dated 01.04.2009 passed in s.a.no 501/95 is recalled and the aforesaid is directed to be restored to its original number. m.c.c.stands allowed accordingly. a copy of this order be placed in the record of s.a.no.501/95. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

M.C.C.No.518/2009 03-05-2013 Heard Shri Suyash Tripathi, learned counsel for applicant on the application for restoration of S.A.No.501/95.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that due some reason he could not attend the hearing of the case which resulted in dismissal of S.A.No.501/95 for want of prosecution.

The application is supported by an affidavit of the counsel for the applicant and as the reasons stated therein appear to be bona fide, the application for restoration is allowed.

The impugned order dated 01.04.2009 passed in S.A.No 501/95 is recalled and the aforesaid is directed to be restored to its original number.

M.C.C.stands allowed accordingly.

A copy of this order be placed in the record of S.A.No.501/95.

C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Tejilal vs Achchelal Same Subject Education