Full Judgment
W.P.No.10729/2013 (Dharmadeep Choubey versus State of MP and otheRs.22.07.2013 Heard Shri J.
Arya, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief.
The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the fact that the petitioner is not being permitted to participate in the counselling that is being held by the authority for making appointment on the post of Samvida Shala Shiksha Grade-II.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has completed his B.Ed.
CouRs.and result thereof has been declared 06.06.2013 during the couRs.of proceedings for counselling and in such circumstances, the petitioner be permitted to participate in the same as the petitioner after obtaining B.Ed.
Degree has become eligible for the same.
On a specific query being made by this court, the learned counsel for the petitioner admits that on the date of filing of application which was prescribed, the petitioner did not possess necessary qualification.
There is nothing on record to indicate that the respondents/authorities have issued any advertisement or circular to permit any person who obtains a B.Ed.
Degree at any point of time even after commencement of the selection process to participate in the selection.
The Supreme Court in the case of Ashok Kumar Sonkar versus Union of India and others (2007) 4 SCC 5.has held that necessary educational qualification must be possessed by the candidates concerned on the last date specifically for filling up the forMs.As there is nothing on record to indicate that the petitioner possessed the same on such date and as it is an admitted fact that when the process started the petitioner did not possess qualification of B.Ed.
which he has acquired only on 06.06.2013, therefore, in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court, I find no merits in the case.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
(R.S.Jha) Judge msp