Jivan Kumar Vs. Nandkishore Gupta

Jivan Kumar vs Nandkishore Gupta

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 24, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1043835

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1043835
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Sep 24, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jivan Kumar

Advocate Shri. S.P.Tripathi

Respondent

Nandkishore Gupta

Advocate Shri. Anil Khare

Excerpt

s.a.no.614/2012 24.09.2012 shri s.p.tripathi, learned counsel for the appellants. shri anil khare, learned counsel for the respondent. heard on the question of admission. this appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law : “(i) whether two courts below were justified in granting the decree under section 12(1)(c) of m.p.accommodation control act while decreeing the suit filed by the plaintiff/ respondent ?. (ii) whether two courts below were justified to decree the suit under section 12(1)(e) of the m.p.accommodation control act on the ground of bona fide need and the finding so recorded is not pervers.?.”. let copy of appeal memo as well as questions of law be supplied to the other side. till final hearing of this appeal, interim order passed earlier shall remain in operation. considering the fact that the decree has also been granted under section 12(1)(e) of m.p.accommodation control act (bona fide need).list this appeal for final hearing in the third week of november, 2012. c.c.as per rules. (j.k.maheshwari) judge ts.

Full Judgment

S.A.No.614/2012 24.09.2012 Shri S.P.Tripathi, learned counsel for the appellants.

Shri Anil Khare, learned counsel for the respondent.

Heard on the question of admission.

This appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law : “(i) Whether two Courts below were justified in granting the decree under Section 12(1)(c) of M.P.Accommodation Control Act while decreeing the suit filed by the plaintiff/ respondent ?.

(ii) Whether two Courts below were justified to decree the suit under Section 12(1)(e) of the M.P.Accommodation Control Act on the ground of bona fide need and the finding so recorded is not perveRs.?.”.

Let copy of appeal memo as well as questions of law be supplied to the other side.

Till final hearing of this appeal, interim order passed earlier shall remain in operation.

Considering the fact that the decree has also been granted under Section 12(1)(e) of M.P.Accommodation Control Act (bona fide need).list this appeal for final hearing in the third week of November, 2012.

C.C.as per rules.

(J.K.Maheshwari) Judge ts.

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Jivan Kumar vs Nandkishore Gupta Same Subject Land Acquisition