Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Virendra Kumar Shrivas Vs. State of M.P.

Virendra Kumar Shrivas vs State of M.P.

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 24, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1043821

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Virendra Kumar Shrivas

Advocate Shri. Sanjay Sanyal

Respondent

State of M.P.

Excerpt

writ petition no.5871/200”24. 09.2012 shri sanjay sanyal, learned counsel for the petitioners.shri vivek sharma, learned panel lawyer for the respondents-state. the order-sheet indicates that opportunities were granted to learned counsel for the respondents to seek instructions whether any policy is made by the state government pursuant to the recommendation made by the u.g.c.or not and whether the same has been applicable to the persons like petitioner. again today a request for grant of time is made on the ground that there was lack of communication on account of which the information could not be obtained. the matter is of the year 2006 and ample opportunities have been granted to the respondents to seek instructions and make a submission before this court. however, in the interest of justice, as a last opportunity, four weeks time is allowed to obtain the instructions and make a submission before this court. if this is not done, the principal secretary of the department of technical education, would be ordered to remain present before this court. list on 19th november, 2012. a free copy of this order be made available to learned panel lawyer for communication of the same to the respondents. (k.k.trivedi) judge skc

Full Judgment

WRIT PETITION No.5871/200”

24. 09.2012 Shri Sanjay Sanyal, learned Counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Vivek Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents-State.

The order-sheet indicates that opportunities were granted to learned counsel for the respondents to seek instructions whether any policy is made by the State Government pursuant to the recommendation made by the U.G.C.or not and whether the same has been applicable to the persons like petitioner.

Again today a request for grant of time is made on the ground that there was lack of communication on account of which the information could not be obtained.

The matter is of the year 2006 and ample opportunities have been granted to the respondents to seek instructions and make a submission before this Court.

However, in the interest of justice, as a last opportunity, four weeks time is allowed to obtain the instructions and make a submission before this Court.

If this is not done, the Principal Secretary of the Department of Technical Education, would be ordered to remain present before this Court.

List on 19th November, 2012.

A free copy of this order be made available to learned Panel Lawyer for communication of the same to the respondents.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge Skc

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial