Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Moti Lal Vs. Dadu

Moti Lal vs Dadu

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 24, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1043805

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Moti Lal

Advocate Shri. Rajendra Gupta

Respondent

Dadu

Advocate Shri. A.P.Shah

Excerpt

s.a.no.988/2012 24.09.2012 shri rajendra gupta, learned counsel for the appellant. shri a.p.shah, learned counsel for the respondent no.1, on caveat. shri rahul jain, learned govt. advocate for respondent no.3. shri shah, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.1 and shri rahul jain, learned govt., accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.3. issue notice to respondent no.2 against admission as well as on i.a.no.10446/2012, on payment of p.f.within three days. until admission of the appeal, status quo with respect to possession shall be maintained by the parties. in the meantime, record of two courts below be called for. list thereafter for admission as well as for further orders on i.a.no.10446/2012. c.c.as per rules. (j.k.maheshwari) judge ts.

Full Judgment

S.A.No.988/2012 24.09.2012 Shri Rajendra Gupta, learned counsel for the appellant.

Shri A.P.Shah, learned counsel for the respondent No.1, on caveat.

Shri Rahul Jain, learned Govt.

Advocate for respondent No.3.

Shri Shah, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and Shri Rahul Jain, learned Govt., accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.3.

Issue notice to respondent No.2 against admission as well as on I.A.No.10446/2012, on payment of P.F.within three days.

Until admission of the appeal, status quo with respect to possession shall be maintained by the parties.

In the meantime, record of two Courts below be called for.

List thereafter for admission as well as for further orders on I.A.No.10446/2012.

C.C.as per rules.

(J.K.Maheshwari) Judge ts.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial