Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Man Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Man Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 24, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1043778

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Man Singh

Advocate Shri. S.K.Dubey

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

man singh versus state of mp and others.24.09.2012. shri s.k.dubey, counsel for the petitioner. shri s.s.bisen, government advocate, for the respondents/state, on advance notice. petitioner is working as an assistant teacher in government primary school harry, block sohagpur, district- shahdol. by the impugned order dated 13-07-2012 passed by the assistant commissioner, district-shahdol, petitioner has been transferred from government primary school, harry to government primary school kudra tola. challenge to the order of transfer is made mainly on the ground that under the right of children to free & compulsory education act, 2009, there should be at least one teacher for every thirty five children. it is pointed out that if the petitioner is transferred the students-teacher ratio would be disturbed and the statutory provision of right of children to free & compulsory education act, 2009 would be violated and, therefore, the transfer is illegal. the question as to how the students-teacher ratio should be maintained, reduction of number of teachers and breach of statutory rule is a matter to be considered by the competent authority and on the aforesaid grounds, interference into the administrative order of transfer is not warranted. it is for the respondent no.3 to look into the matter on the grounds raised and take action. 2 keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that on the petitioner's filing a certified copy of this order along with a detailed representation, if not already done, respondent no.3 shall decide the claim of the petitioner after adverting to the grounds raised by the petitioner. with the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge aks/-

Full Judgment

Man Singh versus State of MP and otheRs.24.09.2012.

Shri S.K.Dubey, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri S.S.Bisen, Government Advocate, for the respondents/State, on advance notice.

Petitioner is working as an Assistant Teacher in Government Primary School Harry, Block Sohagpur, District- Shahdol.

By the impugned order dated 13-07-2012 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, District-Shahdol, petitioner has been transferred from Government Primary School, Harry to Government Primary School Kudra Tola.

Challenge to the order of transfer is made mainly on the ground that under the Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act, 2009, there should be at least one teacher for every thirty five children.

It is pointed out that if the petitioner is transferred the students-teacher ratio would be disturbed and the statutory provision of Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act, 2009 would be violated and, therefore, the transfer is illegal.

The question as to how the students-teacher ratio should be maintained, reduction of number of teachers and breach of statutory rule is a matter to be considered by the Competent Authority and on the aforesaid grounds, interference into the administrative order of transfer is not warranted.

It is for the Respondent No.3 to look into the matter on the grounds raised and take action.

2 Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that on the petitioner's filing a certified copy of this order along with a detailed representation, if not already done, Respondent No.3 shall decide the claim of the petitioner after adverting to the grounds raised by the petitioner.

With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of.

Certified Copy as per rules.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial