Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mahesh Kumar Modi Vs. Mahendra Kumar Jain

Mahesh Kumar Modi vs Mahendra Kumar Jain

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 24, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1043748

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mahesh Kumar Modi

Advocate Shri. Sanjay K. Agrawal

Respondent

Mahendra Kumar Jain

Advocate Shri. K.L.Gupta

Excerpt

s.a.no.664/2012 24.09.2012 shri sanjay k. agrawal, learned counsel for the appellant. shri k.l.gupta, learned counsel for the respondent. heard on the question of admission. this appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law : “(i) whether lower appellate court was justified to decree the suit filed by the plaintiff on the ground of bona fide need without recording the finding to that effect and also without considering the cross- objection filed in this regard by the defendant, however, the judgment and decree passed by lower appellate court is vitiated on this ground ?.”. let copy of appeal memo as well as questions of law be supplied to the other side. till final disposal of this appeal, interim order passed earlier shall remain in operation. considering the fact that that this appeal relates to eviction on the ground of bona fide need, however, list this appeal for final hearing in the month of november, 2012. c.c.as per rules. (j.k.maheshwari) judge ts.

Full Judgment

S.A.No.664/2012 24.09.2012 Shri Sanjay K.

Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellant.

Shri K.L.Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent.

Heard on the question of admission.

This appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law : “(i) Whether lower appellate Court was justified to decree the suit filed by the plaintiff on the ground of bona fide need without recording the finding to that effect and also without considering the cross- objection filed in this regard by the defendant, however, the judgment and decree passed by lower appellate Court is vitiated on this ground ?.”.

Let copy of appeal memo as well as questions of law be supplied to the other side.

Till final disposal of this appeal, interim order passed earlier shall remain in operation.

Considering the fact that that this appeal relates to eviction on the ground of bona fide need, however, list this appeal for final hearing in the month of November, 2012.

C.C.as per rules.

(J.K.Maheshwari) Judge ts.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial