Devkaran Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Devkaran vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 29, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1043603

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1043603
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Apr 29, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devkaran

Advocate Shri. Abdul Waheed Choudhary

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Advocate Shri. Avinash Zargar

Excerpt

1 w.p.no.14658/2011 29/4/2013: shri abdul waheed choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri avinash zargar, learned counsel for the respondents. challenging an interlocutory order dated 2.8.2011 by which stamp duty is directed to be paid on registered sale deed dated 10.6.1954, petitioner has filed this writ petition under article 227 of the constitution. the court on the ground that the document is not admissible in evidence has refused to take the document on record, apart from the fact that the document does not bear sufficient stamp. nothing is brought on record on the basis of which the findings recorded by the court below can be termed as pervers.or illegal warranting interference in this petition. accordingly, finding no case for interference, petition is dismissed. ( rajendra meno.) judge mrs.mishra

Full Judgment

1 W.P.No.14658/2011 29/4/2013: Shri Abdul Waheed Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Avinash Zargar, learned counsel for the respondents.

Challenging an interlocutory order dated 2.8.2011 by which stamp duty is directed to be paid on registered sale deed dated 10.6.1954, petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution.

The Court on the ground that the document is not admissible in evidence has refused to take the document on record, apart from the fact that the document does not bear sufficient stamp.

Nothing is brought on record on the basis of which the findings recorded by the Court below can be termed as perveRs.or illegal warranting interference in this petition.

Accordingly, finding no case for interference, petition is dismissed.

( Rajendra MeNo.) Judge Mrs.mishra

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Devkaran vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education