Full Judgment
Writ Petition No.10305/2013 26.06.2013 Shri R.S.Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner.
He is heard on the question of admission.
The petitioner-husband has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the order dated 17.4.2013, (P-4) passed in Hindu Marriage Case No.63/09 by Ist Additional District Judge, Mandla, whereby in the case filed by the petitioner against the respondent - wife under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, (in short “The Act”.) for Restitution of Conjugal Rights, an application filed by the respondent no.1- wife under Section 24 of aforesaid Act has been allowed and he has been directed to pay her Rs.2000/- per month as interim alimony till disposal of the petition and Rs.3000/- as litigation expenses.
Having heard the counsel, keeping in view his arguments, after perusing the record available, I have found sufficient circumstance for passing the impugned order directing the petitioner to pay interim alimony and the litigation expenses.
In such premises, I have not found any error, perversity illegality, irregularity or anything against the propriety of law in the order impugned.
Consequently, this petition being devoid of any merits is hereby dismissed.
C c as per rules.
(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge bks