Hariram Raikwar and anr. Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.

Hariram Raikwar and anr. vs The State of M.P. and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 09, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1043420

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1043420
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 09, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hariram Raikwar and anr.

Advocate Shri. S.A.Wakeel

Respondent

The State of M.P. and ors.

Excerpt

w.p.no.5629/2002 09.10.2012 shri s.a.wakeel, learned counsel for the petitioners.shri r.p.tiwari, learned govt. advocate for the respondent/state. after arguing at length, when confronted with the decision of the supreme court rendered in the cases of jaco.mathew versus state of punjab and another (2005).scc 1.state of punjab versus shiv ram and others (2005) 7 scc 1.martin f.d'souza versus mohd. ishfaq (2009) 3 scc 1 and kusum sharma and others versus batra hospital and research centre and others (2010) 3 scc 480.the learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to take up proceedings for mitigation of their grievances, if so advised. with the aforesaid liberty, the petition filed by the petitioners stands disposed of as withdrawn. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge gn

Full Judgment

W.P.No.5629/2002 09.10.2012 Shri S.A.Wakeel, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri R.P.Tiwari, learned Govt.

Advocate for the respondent/State.

After arguing at length, when confronted with the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in the cases of JaCo.Mathew versus State of Punjab and another (2005).SCC 1.State of Punjab versus Shiv Ram and Others (2005) 7 SCC 1.Martin F.D'Souza versus Mohd.

Ishfaq (2009) 3 SCC 1 and Kusum Sharma and others versus Batra Hospital and Research Centre and others (2010) 3 SCC 480.the learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to take up proceedings for mitigation of their grievances, if so advised.

With the aforesaid liberty, the petition filed by the petitioners stands disposed of as withdrawn.

C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge gn

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Hariram Raikwar and anr. vs The State of M.P. and ors. Same Subject Land Acquisition