Full Judgment
1 W.P.No.15566/12 (O).9.10.2012.
Shri Arup K.
Das, learned counsel for the petitioner.
He is heard on the question of admission.
Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India for issuing appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order daed 7.8.2012 whereby the respondent No.4 has been allotted the LPG dealership by the respondent No.2 and 3.
After taking me through the averments of the petition as well as the papers placed on record the petitioner's counsel said that on proper consideration the respondent No.4 was not qualified for allotment of aforesaid LPG dealership inspite that by ignoring all concerned rules and regulations such dealership has been allotted to the respondent No.4 and prayed for admission and allowing this petition.
Keeping in view the arguments advanced by the counsel, after perusing the record I have found that representation of the petitioner (Ann.
P.3) dated 28.8.2012 is still pending before respondent No.2 and 3 for consideration.
In view of pendency of such representation instead to admit or issue notice of this petition to the other side, the same is disposed of with a direction to the authorities of the respondent No.2 and 3 to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking order under intimation to the petitioner within thirty days from the date of submitting the certified copy of this order along with the copy of this petition with annexures in the office of the authorities of the respondent No.2 an”
3.
It is made clear that if any step is taken by the authorities of the respondent No.2 and 3 in continuation of allotment of aforesaid dealership of LPG, the same shall be subjected to the final decision on the representation of the petitioner.
The petitioner is directed to submit the aforesaid papers within seven days from today in the office of the respondent No.2 and 3.
The petition is disposed of as indicated above.C.C.
as per rules.
(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge k