Amit Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Amit Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 03, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1043315

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1043315
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 03, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amit Kumar

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Advocate Shri. Ritesh Sharma

Excerpt

w.p.no.15684/2012 (amit kumar versus state of mp and others.03.10.2012 petitioner in person along with his counsel shri virendra singh. shri r.p.tiwari, learned counsel for the state. shri a.m.trivedi, learned sr.counsel with shri sushil mishra, for the respondent no.7. shri ritesh sharma, learned counsel for the respondent no.8. the police authorities have produced the missing person. she appears and states before this court that she wishes to stay and go with her parents with whom she is living on her own and free will without any pressure or coercion. in view of the statement of the missing person aradhna shukla before this court, i find no reason to issue any direction in the present petition. the writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the statement of the petitioner made before this court. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

W.P.No.15684/2012 (Amit Kumar versus State of MP and otheRs.03.10.2012 Petitioner in person along with his counsel Shri Virendra Singh.

Shri R.P.Tiwari, learned counsel for the State.

Shri A.M.Trivedi, learned Sr.counsel with Shri Sushil Mishra, for the respondent No.7.

Shri Ritesh Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent No.8.

The Police authorities have produced the missing person.

She appears and states before this court that she wishes to stay and go with her parents with whom she is living on her own and free will without any pressure or coercion.

In view of the statement of the missing person Aradhna Shukla before this court, I find no reason to issue any direction in the present petition.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the statement of the petitioner made before this court.

C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Amit Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education