Hari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Hari vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 17, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1043261

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1043261
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 17, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hari

Advocate Shri. Anoop Saxena

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.6660/2013 m.cr.c.no.6660/2013 17.7.2013 shri anoop saxena, counsel for the applicants. shri g.s.thakur, panel lawyer for the state/ respondent no.1. as prayed by the learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard finally. the applicants have moved an application for extension of time given by order dated 13.12.2011 passed in criminal appeal no.585/1999. vide that order the single bench of this court has directed that enhanced fine be deposited within a period of 3 months and in default of payment of fine, rigorous imprisonment of 2 months was also directed. however, the order was passed in the year 2011 and the applicants did not take care to deposit the fine amount in last two years.under such circumstances, no enhanced time can be granted. however, attention of the trial court is invited to the provisions of section 68 of ipc that after arrest of the applicants, if they deposit the fine amount then, their default sentence may be terminated. consequently, the present petition under section 482 of the cr.p.c.is hereby dismissed with the aforesaid directions. (n.k.gupta) judge m.cr.c.no.6660/2013 pushpendra

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.6660/2013 M.Cr.C.No.6660/2013 17.7.2013 Shri Anoop Saxena, counsel for the applicants.

Shri G.S.Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent No.1.

As prayed by the learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard finally.

The applicants have moved an application for extension of time given by order dated 13.12.2011 passed in criminal appeal No.585/1999.

Vide that order the single Bench of this Court has directed that enhanced fine be deposited within a period of 3 months and in default of payment of fine, rigorous imprisonment of 2 months was also directed.

However, the order was passed in the year 2011 and the applicants did not take care to deposit the fine amount in last two yeaRs.Under such circumstances, no enhanced time can be granted.

However, attention of the trial Court is invited to the provisions of section 68 of IPC that after arrest of the applicants, if they deposit the fine amount then, their default sentence may be terminated.

Consequently, the present petition under section 482 of the Cr.P.C.is hereby dismissed with the aforesaid directions.

(N.K.GUPTA) JUDGE M.Cr.C.No.6660/2013 Pushpendra

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Hari vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education