Shamiulla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Shamiulla vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 07, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1043082

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1043082
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Sep 07, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shamiulla

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

criminal appeal no.836 o”07. 09/2012 shri l.n.sakle, advocate for the appellants. shri puneet shroti, panel lawyer for the state. no case is made out for suspension of sentence and release on bail to appellant no.2 sayeed khan, therefore the application i.a.no.14966/2011, which is 6th bail application on his behalf is dismissed. (krishn kumar lahoti) (smt.vimla jain) judge judge manju writ appeal no.903 o”05. 09/2012 shri vijay pandey, dy. advocate general for the appellant. smt. sarita chourasiya, advocate for respondent. learned counsel for the respondent prays two weeks time to file reply of i.a.no.10218/2012, seeking condonation of delay. in the interest of justice, prayer is allowed. be listed for hearing after two weeks. (krishn kumar lahoti) (smt.vimla jain) judge judge manju

Full Judgment

Criminal Appeal No.836 o”

07. 09/2012 Shri L.N.Sakle, Advocate for the appellants.

Shri Puneet Shroti, Panel Lawyer for the State.

No case is made out for suspension of sentence and release on bail to appellant No.2 Sayeed Khan, therefore the application I.A.No.14966/2011, which is 6th bail application on his behalf is dismissed.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.Vimla Jain) JUDGE JUDGE manju Writ Appeal No.903 o”

05. 09/2012 Shri Vijay Pandey, Dy.

Advocate General for the appellant.

Smt.

Sarita Chourasiya, Advocate for respondent.

Learned counsel for the respondent prays two weeks time to file reply of I.A.No.10218/2012, seeking condonation of delay.

In the interest of justice, prayer is allowed.

Be listed for hearing after two weeks.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.Vimla Jain) JUDGE JUDGE manju

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Shamiulla vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education