Kammod Vs. Balmukund

Kammod vs Balmukund

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 04, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042939

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042939
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Feb 04, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kammod

Respondent

Balmukund

Advocate Shri. Pranay Verma

Excerpt

civil revision no.269/200”04. 02.2013 none for the applicants, though specifically a direction was issued by this court on 17.12.2012 to the parties to remain present before the court for verifying whether any possibility of compromise in the matter is there or not. shri pranay verma, learned counsel for the respondents along with respondent no.1 is present in the court. it is stated by learned counsel for the respondents that the applicants are not interested in any compromise and that is why they have not appeared before this court. since even the counsel for the applicants is not present to prosecute the revision, instead of dismissing the revision, the interim order dated 12.09.2007 is hereby vacated. let the revision be listed in the month of march, 2013 for final hearing. certified copy as per rules. (k.k.trivedi) judge skc

Full Judgment

CIVIL REVISION No.269/200”

04. 02.2013 None for the applicants, though specifically a direction was issued by this Court on 17.12.2012 to the parties to remain present before the Court for verifying whether any possibility of compromise in the matter is there or not.

Shri Pranay Verma, learned Counsel for the respondents along with respondent No.1 is present in the Court.

It is stated by learned Counsel for the respondents that the applicants are not interested in any compromise and that is why they have not appeared before this Court.

Since even the Counsel for the applicants is not present to prosecute the revision, instead of dismissing the revision, the interim order dated 12.09.2007 is hereby vacated.

Let the revision be listed in the month of March, 2013 for final hearing.

Certified copy as per rules.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge Skc

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Kammod vs Balmukund Same Subject Education