Jitendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Jitendra Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 25, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042909

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042909
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 25, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jitendra Singh

Advocate Shri. Rajendra Pandey

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.11961/2013 (jitendra singh versus state of mp and another) 25.07.2013 shri rajendra pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. looking to the fact that previous order passed in petitioner's case in w.p no.4254/2010 had been issued by the principal seat of the high court, therefore, the objection regarding territorial jurisdiction stands overruled. heard on the question of admission and interim relief. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order date 16/4/2013 has been recalled and set aside by a subsequent order passed by the collector dated 26/6/2013 and the cases of the petitioner and others have been directed to be scrutinized in the light of the decision rendered in the case of secretary, state of karnataka and others versus umadevi and others (2006) 4 scc 1.and therefore the present petition be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the representation pending before the authorities for scrutiny of his case. in view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the prayer made by the petitioner is allowed and the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take up the matter before the respondent/authorities in accordance with law. with the aforesaid liberty, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. c.c as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

W.P.No.11961/2013 (Jitendra Singh versus State of MP and another) 25.07.2013 Shri Rajendra Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Looking to the fact that previous order passed in petitioner's case in W.P No.4254/2010 had been issued by the Principal Seat of the High Court, therefore, the objection regarding territorial jurisdiction stands overruled.

Heard on the question of admission and interim relief.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order date 16/4/2013 has been recalled and set aside by a subsequent order passed by the Collector dated 26/6/2013 and the cases of the petitioner and others have been directed to be scrutinized in the light of the decision rendered in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and others versus Umadevi and others (2006) 4 SCC 1.and therefore the present petition be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the representation pending before the authorities for scrutiny of his case.

In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the prayer made by the petitioner is allowed and the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take up the matter before the respondent/authorities in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid liberty, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.

C.C as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Jitendra Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition