Mihilal Ahirwar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Mihilal Ahirwar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 03, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042849

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042849
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Sep 03, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mihilal Ahirwar

Advocate Shri. P.S.Sengar

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.13980/2012 (mihilal ahirwar versus state of mp and others.03.09.2012 heard shri p.s.sengar, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. the petitioner has filed this petition alleging inaction on the part of the police authorities on the complaint filed by the petitioner against the respondents no.5 to 7 in respect of death of his daughter. in the circumstances, without entering into the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/authorities to look into the matter and deal with the same in accordance with law. it is made clear that this court has not issued any direction to the respondents/authorities to prosecute the respondents no.5 to 7 or to compulsorily register a case against them, therefore they would be at liberty to examine the matter and take steps in accordance with law. to enable the respondents/authorities to do so, a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition be served upon them by the petitioner. with the aforesaid directions, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

W.P.No.13980/2012 (Mihilal Ahirwar versus State of MP and otheRs.03.09.2012 Heard Shri P.S.Sengar, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief.

The petitioner has filed this petition alleging inaction on the part of the police authorities on the complaint filed by the petitioner against the respondents No.5 to 7 in respect of death of his daughter.

In the circumstances, without entering into the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/authorities to look into the matter and deal with the same in accordance with law.

It is made clear that this court has not issued any direction to the respondents/authorities to prosecute the respondents No.5 to 7 or to compulsorily register a case against them, therefore they would be at liberty to examine the matter and take steps in accordance with law.

To enable the respondents/authorities to do so, a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition be served upon them by the petitioner.

With the aforesaid directions, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.

C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Mihilal Ahirwar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education