Vinod Kumar Choudhari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Vinod Kumar Choudhari vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 03, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042836

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042836
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Sep 03, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vinod Kumar Choudhari

Advocate Shri. Vivek Shukla

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.7216/2012 03.09.2012 shri vivek shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri yogesh dhande, learned deputy government advocate for the respondents/state on advance copy. though the answer book has not been placed on record by the petitioner after obtaining it under right to information act, but a categorical statement has been made that the answer book of the petitioner was not checked and this fact was orally informed to the petitioner. looking to the aforesaid, let an appropriate short affidavit to this effect be filed by the respondent no.4, to indicate as to why the answer book of the petitioner was not checked. the affidavit be filed within two weeks. list immediately after two weeks. (k.k.trivedi) judge b

Full Judgment

W.P.No.7216/2012 03.09.2012 Shri Vivek Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Yogesh Dhande, learned Deputy Government Advocate for the respondents/State on advance copy.

Though the answer book has not been placed on record by the petitioner after obtaining it under Right to Information Act, but a categorical statement has been made that the answer book of the petitioner was not checked and this fact was orally informed to the petitioner.

Looking to the aforesaid, let an appropriate short affidavit to this effect be filed by the respondent No.4, to indicate as to why the answer book of the petitioner was not checked.

The affidavit be filed within two weeks.

List immediately after two weeks.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge b

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Vinod Kumar Choudhari vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education