Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Krishna Kumar Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Krishna Kumar Patel vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 03, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042810

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishna Kumar Patel

Advocate Shri. Anubhav Jain

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

mcc. no.919/2012 03.09.2012 shri anubhav jain, learned counsel for the applicant. this is an application for restoration of w.p no.208/2004 dismissed for want of prosecution by order dated 31.07.2012. it is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the aforesaid petition stood dismissed on account of the fact that the counsel for the applicant was on his leg before an another bench and as such could not remain present when the matter was called up for hearing and due to his non-appearance the petition came to be dismissed for want of prosecution. in such circumstances, it is submitted that the application for restoration deserves to be allowed. the application is supported by an affidavit of the applicant. having heard the learned counsel for the applicant and looking to the fact that the reasons stated in the application for restoration are bonafide, the same is allowed. the impugned order dated 31.07.2012 passed in w.p no.208/2004 is recalled and is directed to be restored to its original number subject to payment of p.f within seven days for issuance of notice to the respondents in the aforesaid writ petition informing them of the restoration of the writ petition. this m.c.c stands disposed of. a copy of this order be placed in the record of w.p no.208/2004. c.c as per rules. ( r.s.jha ) judge mcc. no.919/2012 gn

Full Judgment

MCC.

No.919/2012 03.09.2012 Shri Anubhav Jain, learned counsel for the applicant.

This is an application for restoration of W.P No.208/2004 dismissed for want of prosecution by order dated 31.07.2012.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the aforesaid petition stood dismissed on account of the fact that the counsel for the applicant was on his leg before an another Bench and as such could not remain present when the matter was called up for hearing and due to his non-appearance the petition came to be dismissed for want of prosecution.

In such circumstances, it is submitted that the application for restoration deserves to be allowed.

The application is supported by an affidavit of the applicant.

Having heard the learned counsel for the applicant and looking to the fact that the reasons stated in the application for restoration are bonafide, the same is allowed.

The impugned order dated 31.07.2012 passed in W.P No.208/2004 is recalled and is directed to be restored to its original number subject to payment of P.F within seven days for issuance of notice to the respondents in the aforesaid writ petition informing them of the restoration of the writ petition.

This M.C.C stands disposed of.

A copy of this order be placed in the record of W.P No.208/2004.

C.C as per rules.

( R.S.JHA ) JUDGE MCC.

No.919/2012 gn

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial