Kashi Bai Vs. Poona Bai

Kashi Bai vs Poona Bai

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 03, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042790

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042790
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Sep 03, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kashi Bai

Advocate Shri. V.N.Patel

Respondent

Poona Bai

Excerpt

fa no.184 o”3. 8.2012. shri r.k.verma for the appellant. shri v.n.patel for the respondent. learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the court fees could not be realized from the counsel to whom it was earlier paid and not the appellant has managed the court fees and has paid along with an application - i.a.no.8853/12. we have perused the contents of the application and find that the appellant has made out a case for extension of time for payment of the court fees. accordingly, time period for payment of court fees is extended till today and the court fees is taken on record. heard on admission. this appeal is admitted for final hearing. notice on behalf of the respondent is accepted by shri patel. record of the trial court be summoned. i.a.no.8181/12 for dismissal of appeal because of non- payment of court fees as per the order passed by this court : in view of the order passed hereinabove, this application has rendered infructuous and it is accordingly dismissed. (krishn kumar lahoti) (tarun kumar kaushal) judge judge khan*

Full Judgment

FA No.184 o”

3. 8.2012.

Shri R.K.Verma for the appellant.

Shri V.N.Patel for the respondent.

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the court fees could not be realized from the counsel to whom it was earlier paid and not the appellant has managed the court fees and has paid along with an application - I.A.No.8853/12.

We have perused the contents of the application and find that the appellant has made out a case for extension of time for payment of the court fees.

Accordingly, time period for payment of court fees is extended till today and the court fees is taken on record.

Heard on admission.

This appeal is admitted for final hearing.

Notice on behalf of the respondent is accepted by Shri Patel.

Record of the trial Court be summoned.

I.A.No.8181/12 for dismissal of appeal because of non- payment of court fees as per the order passed by this Court : In view of the order passed hereinabove, this application has rendered infructuous and it is accordingly dismissed.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Tarun Kumar Kaushal) Judge Judge Khan*

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Kashi Bai vs Poona Bai Same Subject Education