Virendra Kumar Shrivas Vs. State of M.P.

Virendra Kumar Shrivas vs State of M.P.

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 28, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042607

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042607
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Aug 28, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Virendra Kumar Shrivas

Advocate Shri. Sanjay Sanyal

Respondent

State of M.P.

Excerpt

w.p.no.5871/2006 28.08.2012 shri sanjay sanyal, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri samdarshi tiwari, learned govt. advocate for respondent-state. this court has granted an opportunity to the state to verify certain facts as it was stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue involved in the present petition is covered by a decision rendered by this court in wp(s) no.1834/2005. it is stated by learned govt. advocate that he is required to seek instructions whether any policy is made by the state government pursuance to the recommendations made by the ugc or not and whether the same has been made applicable to the persons like petitioner. for the said purpose, a short adjournment is sought. list in the week commencing 24.9.2012 to enable the learned govt. advocate to seek instructions. (k.k.trivedi) judge. a.praj.

Full Judgment

W.P.No.5871/2006 28.08.2012 Shri Sanjay Sanyal, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, learned Govt.

Advocate for respondent-State.

This Court has granted an opportunity to the State to verify certain facts as it was stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue involved in the present petition is covered by a decision rendered by this Court in WP(S) No.1834/2005.

It is stated by learned Govt.

Advocate that he is required to seek instructions whether any policy is made by the State Government pursuance to the recommendations made by the UGC or not and whether the same has been made applicable to the persons like petitioner.

For the said purpose, a short adjournment is sought.

List in the week commencing 24.9.2012 to enable the learned Govt.

Advocate to seek instructions.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge.

A.Praj.

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Virendra Kumar Shrivas vs State of M.P. Same Subject Education