Rajendra Kumar Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Rajendra Kumar Sharma vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 28, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042590

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042590
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Aug 28, 2012
Subject: Banking

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Banking

Key legal issue: Banking

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajendra Kumar Sharma

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

28.08.2012. shri p. choubey and shri tapan bathre for the petitioner. shri sanjeev kumar singh, panel lawyer, for the state on advance notice. petitioner is working as a forest range officer in forest department, rehatgaon, harda and by the impugned order dated 9.8.2012, has been transferred to bhopal. challenge to the order of transfer is made mainly on the ground that petitioner came to rehatgaon only two months back and the transfer amounts to frequent transfer. shri sanjeev kumar singh, learned panel lawyer, points out that posting of the petitioner at rehatgaon was a local adjustment made by transferring the petitioner within the area by the local officer, but not petitioner, who has completed his tenure posting in district hardha, is being transferred from harda to bhopal and, therefore, in the absence of any statutory rule or regulation being shown to be violated, it is stated that interference into the matter is not called for. having heard learned counsel for the parties and on a perusal of records, it is clear that petitioner has been transferred from one district to another not after the period of his tenure posting and in the absence of any statutory rule or regulation being violated, i see no ground to interfere into the matter. accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recours.to the departmental remedies available, the petition is disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge aks/-

Full Judgment

28.08.2012.

Shri P.

Choubey and Shri Tapan Bathre for the petitioner.

Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Panel Lawyer, for the State on advance notice.

Petitioner is working as a Forest Range Officer in Forest Department, Rehatgaon, Harda and by the impugned order dated 9.8.2012, has been transferred to Bhopal.

Challenge to the order of transfer is made mainly on the ground that petitioner came to Rehatgaon only two months back and the transfer amounts to frequent transfer.

Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer, points out that posting of the petitioner at Rehatgaon was a local adjustment made by transferring the petitioner within the area by the Local Officer, but not petitioner, who has completed his tenure posting in District Hardha, is being transferred from Harda to Bhopal and, therefore, in the absence of any statutory rule or regulation being shown to be violated, it is stated that interference into the matter is not called for.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on a perusal of records, it is clear that petitioner has been transferred from one District to another not after the period of his tenure posting and in the absence of any statutory rule or regulation being violated, I see no ground to interfere into the matter.

Accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recouRs.to the departmental remedies available, the petition is disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Rajendra Kumar Sharma vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Banking