Saurav Kumar Pathak Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Saurav Kumar Pathak vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 28, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042551

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042551
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Aug 28, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Saurav Kumar Pathak

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

28.08.2012. shri vivek sharma for the petitioner. shri sanjeev kumar singh, panel lawyer, for the state on advance notice. grievance of the petitioner is that he is the candidate who has submitted an application for appointment on the post of gram rozgar sahayak, but the computer qualification of the petitioner obtained in graduation level while doing b.co.is not being considered and the representation of the petitioner in this regard is not taken note of. keeping in view the aforesaid grievance of the petitioner, respondent no.3 - the chief executive officer, zila panchayat, district jabalpur is directed to consider the complaint and grievance of the petitioner, decide it and thereafter proceed in the matter of appointment in accordance with law. with the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge aks/-

Full Judgment

28.08.2012.

Shri Vivek Sharma for the petitioner.

Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Panel Lawyer, for the State on advance notice.

Grievance of the petitioner is that he is the candidate who has submitted an application for appointment on the post of Gram Rozgar Sahayak, but the computer qualification of the petitioner obtained in Graduation Level while doing B.Co.is not being considered and the representation of the petitioner in this regard is not taken note of.

Keeping in view the aforesaid grievance of the petitioner, respondent No.3 - the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, District Jabalpur is directed to consider the complaint and grievance of the petitioner, decide it and thereafter proceed in the matter of appointment in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Saurav Kumar Pathak vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education