Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

United States Vs. Florida

United States vs Florida

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-23-1977
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/104253

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
430 U.S. 140
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

United States

Respondent

Florida

Excerpt

united states v. florida - 430 u.s. 140 (1977) u.s. supreme court united states v. florida, 430 u.s. 140 (1977) 430 u.s. 140 united states v. florida et al. on exceptions to report of special master no. 54, orig. argued january 17, 1977 decided february 23, 1977 exceptions to special master's report overruled, and motion to file counter-claim denied. william f. sheehan iii argued the cause for the united states in support of the report of the special master. with him on the brief were solicitor general bork, assistant attorney general taft, bruce c. rashkow, and ralph j. gillis. lee c. clyburn, assistant attorney general of texas, and sidney h. mckenzie iii, assistant deputy attorney general of florida, argued the cause for defendants on exceptions to the report of the special master. with mr. clyburn on the briefs were john l. hill, attorney general of texas, david m. kendall, first assistant attorney general, robert l. shevin, attorney general of florida, and donna b. stinson, assistant attorney general. per curiam. the exceptions of the states of florida and texas to the report of the special master, 429 u.s. 810 (1976), are overruled and the motion for leave to file a counterclaim is denied. so ordered. page 430 u.s. 140, 141

Full Judgment

UNITED STATES v. FLORIDA - 430 U.S. 140 (1977)
U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. FLORIDA, 430 U.S. 140 (1977) 430 U.S. 140

UNITED STATES v. FLORIDA ET AL.
ON EXCEPTIONS TO REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER
No. 54, Orig.
Argued January 17, 1977
Decided February 23, 1977

Exceptions to Special Master's report overruled, and motion to file counter-claim denied.

William F. Sheehan III argued the cause for the United States in support of the Report of the Special Master. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Taft, Bruce C. Rashkow, and Ralph J. Gillis.

Lee C. Clyburn, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, and Sidney H. McKenzie III, Assistant Deputy Attorney General of Florida, argued the cause for defendants on exceptions to the Report of the Special Master. With Mr. Clyburn on the briefs were John L. Hill, Attorney General of Texas, David M. Kendall, First Assistant Attorney General, Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General of Florida, and Donna B. Stinson, Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The exceptions of the States of Florida and Texas to the Report of the Special Master, 429 U.S. 810 (1976), are overruled and the motion for leave to file a counterclaim is denied.

    So ordered.

Page 430 U.S. 140, 141



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial