Narayan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Narayan vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 26, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042477

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042477
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 26, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Narayan

Advocate Shri. Sachin Sisodiya

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.9912/12 (narayan versus the state of mp and others.26.07.2012 heard shri sachin sisodiya, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. the petitioner has filed this petition alleging inaction on the part of the police authorities on the complaint filed by him. in view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2/the superintendent of police, betul to look into the complaint of the petitioner and deal with the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. to enable the respondents no.2 to do so, a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition be served upon him by the petitioner. with the aforesaid directions the petition, filed by the petitioners stands disposed of. c.c as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

W.P.No.9912/12 (Narayan versus The State of MP and otheRs.26.07.2012 Heard Shri Sachin Sisodiya, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief.

The petitioner has filed this petition alleging inaction on the part of the Police authorities on the complaint filed by him.

In view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2/the Superintendent of Police, Betul to look into the complaint of the petitioner and deal with the same expeditiously, in accordance with law.

To enable the respondents No.2 to do so, a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition be served upon him by the petitioner.

With the aforesaid directions the petition, filed by the petitioners stands disposed of.

C.C as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Narayan vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education