Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chhota Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Chhota vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 26, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042450

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chhota

Advocate Shri. Manot Mishra

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.10574 / 2012 (chhota..vs...state of mp & others.26-07-2012 shri manot mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri s.s.bisen, learned g.a.for the state/respondents. heard on the question of admission and interim relief. the petitioner has filed this petition alleging inaction on the part of the police authorities on the complaint filed by him. it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has already approached the police authorities by filing a representation dated 18-6-2012 (annexure p-2) but the same has not been considered and decided by the authorities till date. in the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.6, superintendent of police, chhatarpur, to consider and decide the petitioner's aforesaid representation expeditiously in accordance with law. to enable the said authority to do so, a copy of the order passed by this court today be served upon him by the petitioner. with the aforesaid directions the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. ( r.s.jha ) judge mct

Full Judgment

W.P.No.10574 / 2012 (Chhota..Vs...State of MP & otheRs.26-07-2012 Shri Manot Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri S.S.Bisen, learned G.A.for the State/respondents.

Heard on the question of admission and interim relief.

The petitioner has filed this petition alleging inaction on the part of the police authorities on the complaint filed by him.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has already approached the police authorities by filing a representation dated 18-6-2012 (Annexure P-2) but the same has not been considered and decided by the authorities till date.

In the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.6, Superintendent of Police, Chhatarpur, to consider and decide the petitioner's aforesaid representation expeditiously in accordance with law.

To enable the said authority to do so, a copy of the order passed by this Court today be served upon him by the petitioner.

With the aforesaid directions the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.

C.C.as per rules.

( R.S.Jha ) Judge mct

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial