Manoj Kumar Pathak Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Manoj Kumar Pathak vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 26, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042444

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042444
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 26, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manoj Kumar Pathak

Advocate Shri. Arun Shukla

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 w.p.no.9892/2012 manot kumar pathak versus state of m.p.& ors.26.07.2012 shri arun shukla learned counsel for the petitioner. shri s.s.bisen, learned govt. advocate for the respondent/state, on advance copy. the default, pointed out by the office, is ignored. heard on the question of admission and interim relief. though the petitioner has filed this petition making several allegations, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the collector, chattarpur be directed to decide the revision filed by the petitioner against the dispute raised by him regarding award of contract for supply of mid-day meal which is pending before him. the learned govt. advocate appearing for the respondent/state, on advance copy, submits that revision filed by the petitioner shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. in view of the aforesaid, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 collector, chhatarpur to consider and decide the revision filed by the petitioner expeditiously in accordance with law, 2 w.p.no.9892/2012 manot kumar pathak versus state of m.p.& ors.after hearing all concerned and by passing a reasoned order preferably within a period of three months from the date of furnishing a copy of the order passed today alongwith a copy of the petition on the authority by the petitioner. c.c as per rules. ( r.s.jha ) judge mms/-

Full Judgment

1 W.P.No.9892/2012 Manot Kumar Pathak versus State of M.P.& ORS.26.07.2012 Shri Arun Shukla learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri S.S.Bisen, learned Govt.

Advocate for the respondent/State, on advance copy.

The default, pointed out by the office, is ignored.

Heard on the question of admission and interim relief.

Though the petitioner has filed this petition making several allegations, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Collector, Chattarpur be directed to decide the revision filed by the petitioner against the dispute raised by him regarding award of contract for supply of mid-day meal which is pending before him.

The learned Govt.

Advocate appearing for the respondent/State, on advance copy, submits that revision filed by the petitioner shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

In view of the aforesaid, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 Collector, Chhatarpur to consider and decide the revision filed by the petitioner expeditiously in accordance with law, 2 W.P.No.9892/2012 Manot Kumar Pathak versus State of M.P.& ORS.after hearing all concerned and by passing a reasoned order preferably within a period of three months from the date of furnishing a copy of the order passed today alongwith a copy of the petition on the authority by the petitioner.

C.C as per rules.

( R.S.JHA ) JUDGE mms/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Manoj Kumar Pathak vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition