Mahendra Vs. Narendra Kumar

Mahendra vs Narendra Kumar

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided May 01, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042424

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042424
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: May 01, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mahendra

Advocate Shri. Pradeep Navriya

Respondent

Narendra Kumar

Excerpt

review petition no.313 / 2013 ( mahendra & others ..vs.narendra kumar & another ) 01-05-2013 heard shri pradeep navriya, learned counsel for the petitioners on the question of admission. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the appellants, after the decision of the second appeal, have come to knot that the landlord has taken up proceedings in respect of another premises in the city of tikamgarh for eviction and in such circumstances the judgment and decree dated 15-3-2013 passed in second appeal no.223/2013 needs to be reviewed. it is settled law that a review is permissible only in case of glaring and apparent mistake which is evident from the face of the record of the case itself and is not permissible for re-hearing of the case or re-appreciation of the facts. in the present case there is no ground to review the judgment and decree dated 15-3-2013 passed by this court in second appeal no.223/2013 as there is no apparent mistake evident from the face of the record. the review petition is accordingly rejected. (r.s.jha) mct judge

Full Judgment

Review Petition No.313 / 2013 ( Mahendra & others ..Vs.Narendra Kumar & another ) 01-05-2013 Heard Shri Pradeep Navriya, learned counsel for the petitioners on the question of admission.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the appellants, after the decision of the second appeal, have come to knot that the landlord has taken up proceedings in respect of another premises in the city of Tikamgarh for eviction and in such circumstances the judgment and decree dated 15-3-2013 passed in Second Appeal No.223/2013 needs to be reviewed.

It is settled law that a review is permissible only in case of glaring and apparent mistake which is evident from the face of the record of the case itself and is not permissible for re-hearing of the case or re-appreciation of the facts.

In the present case there is no ground to review the judgment and decree dated 15-3-2013 passed by this Court in Second Appeal No.223/2013 as there is no apparent mistake evident from the face of the record.

The review petition is accordingly rejected.

(R.S.Jha) mct Judge

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Mahendra vs Narendra Kumar Same Subject Education