Harendra Singh Rajput Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Harendra Singh Rajput vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 29, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042274

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042274
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Aug 29, 2012
Subject: Banking

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Banking

Key legal issue: Banking

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Harendra Singh Rajput

Advocate Shri. Vijay Shukla

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

harendra singh versus state w.p.no.12061/2012 29/8/2012 : shri vijay shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri rajesh tiwari, learned govt. adv.for the respondents. petitioner is a panchayat secretary and has been transferred from one gram panchayat to another in the same district of damoh. inter alia contending that petitioner is 70% handicapped and therefore, transfer of the petitioner is contrary to the transfer policy, petitioner has filed this writ petition. merely because the transfer policy is violated, judicial review of an administrative order of transfer is not permissible in view of the law laid down by the division bench in the case of r.s.chaudhary versus state of m.p.and others.i.l.r.(2007) m.p.1329 . in view of the above, finding no case for interference this petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to take recours.to the departmental remedies available. petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid. (rajendra menon) judge mr.mishra

Full Judgment

Harendra Singh versus State W.P.No.12061/2012 29/8/2012 : Shri Vijay Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt.

Adv.for the respondents.

Petitioner is a Panchayat Secretary and has been transferred from one Gram Panchayat to another in the same District of Damoh.

Inter alia contending that petitioner is 70% handicapped and therefore, transfer of the petitioner is contrary to the transfer policy, petitioner has filed this writ petition.

Merely because the transfer policy is violated, judicial review of an administrative order of transfer is not permissible in view of the law laid down by the Division Bench in the case of R.S.Chaudhary versus State of M.P.and otheRs.I.L.R.(2007) M.P.1329 .

In view of the above, finding no case for interference this petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to take recouRs.to the departmental remedies available.

Petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge Mr.mishra

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Harendra Singh Rajput vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Banking