Anil Kumar Singh Vs. Arvind Kumar Singh

Anil Kumar Singh vs Arvind Kumar Singh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 29, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042272

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042272
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Aug 29, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anil Kumar Singh

Respondent

Arvind Kumar Singh

Advocate Shri. Pramod Sahu

Excerpt

1 w.p.no.18982/11. 29.8.2012. none for the petitioner. respondent no.1, 3 and 6 appears to be unserved. shri pramod sahu, learned counsel for respondent no.2. none for the respondent no.4 and 5, although served. shri s.m.lal, learned g.a.for respondent no.7. notice issued to the respondent no.1, 3 and 6 have not been received back served or unserved. in the available circumstances, it is directed that on payment of p.f.along with requisites of registered post within seven days notice as directed earlier, returnable by fixing a date in the month of october, 2012 be issued to the respondent no.1, 3 and 6, failing which this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the bench. (u.c.maheshwari) judge k

Full Judgment

1 W.P.NO.18982/11.

29.8.2012.

None for the petitioner.

Respondent No.1, 3 and 6 appears to be unserved.

Shri Pramod Sahu, learned counsel for respondent No.2.

None for the respondent No.4 and 5, although served.

Shri S.M.Lal, learned G.A.for respondent No.7.

Notice issued to the respondent No.1, 3 and 6 have not been received back served or unserved.

In the available circumstances, it is directed that on payment of P.F.along with requisites of registered post within seven days notice as directed earlier, returnable by fixing a date in the month of October, 2012 be issued to the respondent No.1, 3 and 6, failing which this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the Bench.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge k

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Anil Kumar Singh vs Arvind Kumar Singh Same Subject Land Acquisition